The security sector and security-oriented interventions have long dominated the global struggle against violent extremism. Most governments have dedicated vast resources to hard security and counter-terrorism measures, and far less on the softer, though more complex security approaches. But national and international programs, training and related funding for countering violent extremism (CVE) without adequate oversight have allowed state security actors to legitimize abuse in communities and against civilians. Such counter-productive practices not only result in decreasing public trust in the state, but have also fueled radicalization and the perception that government actors are more problem than solution.
Preventing violent extremism (PVE) in practice is part of a continuum of interventions that includes countering violent extremism and extends to counter-terrorism. PVE does not replace these approaches, but recognizes that they alone cannot solve the problems. Moreover, the PVE framing also shifts the discourse and practice away from being reactive and negative towards more proactive measures that address root causes and promote peace, rights and pluralism in the face of violence, abuse and intolerance.
This report provides a summary of the critical common themes that have arisen, hones in on a holistic solution and presents actionable recommendations to national and international policymakers, security sector practitioners, experts and civil society actors for improving security sector interventions on preventing violent extremism.
You can find the original publication here